The McGill Food Coalition Kick-Off Event – Community and Food Go Hand-in-Hand

By Enkhuun Byambadorj

Food and community were the dominant themes at the McGill Food Coalition’s (MFC) kick-off event on November 15th. Attendees were welcomed with warm coffee, MFC pins, and an honest discussion about the state of McGill University’s food system. 

The event featured a panel discussion, including four prominent members of McGill’s and Montreal’s food communities: Graham Calder – founder of P3 Permaculture, a social enterprise that seeks to make permaculture more accessible; Erik Chevrier – part-time Concordia professor and researcher who helped reform Concordia’s food system; Nat Alexander – project manager at Midnight Kitchen, a non-profit at McGill with a mission to increase the accessibility of food on campus through meal pick-ups and a gardening program; and Karine Houde – representative at Santropol Roulant, a collective dedicated to maintaining the communal nature of food. 

The MFC was started by three McGill undergraduates – Camille Bui, Khadi Sarr, and Rachel Schleifer – with support from CHNGR MTL, a social innovation fellowship for students. The MFC founders saw the food service system at McGill become more profit-driven throughout their university careers, and decided that the “social and environmental dimensions” of food needed to be re-established. 

The MFC founders saw the food service system on McGill’s campus become more and more profit-driven throughout their university experiences, and decided that “social and environmental dimensions” of food needed to be re-established. 

For MFC and the panelists, food is inherently collective, forming an integral part of our identities, communities, and cultures. The panelists, implicitly, and the organizers, explicitly, emphasize that food is more than a transaction. However, the corporate system has made food nothing but one on university campuses, hospitals, and even in prison. 

As international development students, we often discuss barriers to development on a global or national scale. We evaluate the nuances in historical context and the divisive discourse of development as a modern and culturally imperialistic institution, imposing Western values on the so-called developing world. But we must also recognize the development issues much closer to us – the ones in our own university. Food security and the history of corporatization of food systems at McGill and across North American universities are inextricably linked with poverty, race, capitalism, and the rise of conglomerates. 

… we must also recognize the development issues much closer to us – the ones in our own university. Food security and the history of corporatization of food systems at McGill and across North American universities are inextricably linked with poverty, race, capitalism, and the rise of conglomerates. 

In the context of McGill’s food service system, this means increased centralization of food providers over the past 20 years, beginning with the university’s 11-year contract with Coca-Cola in 1999 that made the company the sole distributor of beverages on campus. The number of student-run food businesses has been steadily declining since. Two prominent examples are the permanent closure of the Architecture Café in 2010 and replacement of Tim Hortons with Première Moisson at the Redpath Library basement in 2014. Both decisions were implemented despite great resistance from the student body. 

For Erik Chevrier, this ability to resist and mobilize, coupled with the availability of research funding, resources, and agricultural centers, makes universities the ideal places for reforming our food systems. He calls out the contracts made between universities and companies across North America that give a single food provider the exclusive mandate to offer food services on campus. In McGill’s case, that single provider is Dana Hospitality – a food service franchise. Most students living in residences are signed into a mandatory meal plan provided by Dana. Students today pay $5,975 a year for a limited number of meals. Earlier this year, Dana furthered its monopoly on campus by taking over 11 more cafes

While decisions to centralize the food system were made in the name of improving the quality of ingredients (and despite the many awards and achievements for sustainability the McGill Food and Dining Services (MFDS) has won), affordability and accessibility have been sacrificed in the process. According to Graham Calder, this is one of the many reasons that we are living in a food desert, despite what McGill may view as a place of food security. 

For the MFC founders, it’s vital that the memories of student-run initiatives shut down by the university are preserved. The turnover rate of students is fast compared to the glacial speed of institutional and structural change, and students need to know that the current system is not the norm. For instance, it took 10 years for Concordia to listen to students’ complaints about the university’s profit-driven food service system. Without the memories, new students will have no way of knowing that there used to be an alternative to mandatory meal plans prior to 2009, or that student-run dining options like SNAX used to be much more prevalent. 

The turnover rate of students is fast compared to the glacial speed of institutional and structural change, and students need to know that the current system is not the norm.

While some can afford meal plans and dining options on campus, there are many students who cannot. Those from low-income backgrounds or international students facing harsh exchange rates may be most vulnerable to food insecurity. A survey conducted by the SSMU in 2015 revealed that almost 80% of 1300 surveyed students felt that food on campus was unaffordable. Not much has changed since. 

On a more positive note, a CHNGR representative points out that McGill is not starting out from scratch, referring to its farm on the Macdonald campus, and now the MFC, dedicated to connecting different food groups, supporting new ones, conducting research, and starting a dialogue to let students take back control over our food. 

Following the panel discussion, the audience, panelists, and various food groups on campus were invited to attend a socializing event at ECOLE. Surrounded by good food, fruitful discussions, laughter, and plenty of conversation, the MFC had succeeded in bringing community back to McGill’s food system, at least for the evening.

Edited by Shannon Benson

Photo credits:Food basket” by Liz West. Published 19th of March, 2012. This work was sourced under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic. No changes were made.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s